Poll: Which Sasquatch looks better?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: ORANGE SASQUATCH or WHITE SASQUATCH?

  1. #1
    Heather Hudson Fan First Flight

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    70

    Default ORANGE SASQUATCH or WHITE SASQUATCH?

    Not asking about story lines here, just aesthetics:
    Jolson did it all first,
    Crosby jazzed it up,
    Sinatra perfected it.

  2. #2

    Default

    that is still a question depending on point of view. I like Walt in his body but the look of Snowbird's Sasquatch form was a better look.

  3. #3

    Default

    Orange without a doubt.

  4. #4

    Default

    Orange, though I like the thought of AF fighting a villain that would require the strength of both Sasquatches to beat him/her.

  5. #5

    Default

    I prefer the original Sas, but the cover to #23 remains one of my all time favourites.
    Del

    Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
    Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
    Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
    Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
    Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!

  6. #6

    Default

    I prefer Walter in the Orange look, tho have to admit, the Wanda stories lead a lot for possibilities... I know this would have been unheard of in the late 80's, early 90's, but they could have done so much with the sexuality aspects and ramifications of it, not to mention dealt more with being a woman from a man's perspective...

    ...Would that make Walt Marvel's first Transexual??
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  7. #7

    Default

    Aesthetically, I honestly prefer the white sasquatch. Not sure why, but there's just something about it. Not saying I liked the whole 'Wanda' thing...I like the alternate reality Sas with Heather being Sas.
    Where are we going, and why are we in this hand-basket??

  8. #8

    Default

    Orange, as when she/he was white Sasquatch looked like Wendigo sans a missing tail. All though I do like Wendigo

  9. #9

    Default

    White. I like the Snowbird version of Sassy much better
    (Average person + Internet Forum + Anonymity = Screaming Douchebag)

    "This is why I don't post often, *wink*"

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King Mungi
    ...sans a missing tail...
    Am I the only one who noticed the wording in this post?

    Sorry, Mungi, but the way you phrased that, Sasquatch has a tail ('sans' means 'minus', thus if he was 'minus' a missing tail, he'd have a tail...)

    Love,

    Your friendly neighbourhood grammar police :P
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  11. #11
    Heather Hudson Fan First Flight

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    70

    Default

    Am I the only one who noticed the wording in this post?
    No, you're just the only one who felt the need to point it out.

    I have all but given up trying to correct people's grammar, spelling, etc. on discussion boards as not only does it piss people off half the time, it kinda makes ya look a little pompous. I think if you can understand the point someone's trying to make, that's all that really counts-- it's not like we're in school or even at work where such things matter.

    If ya sweat the small stuff, yer gonna give yerself a Grammar Headache (cuz it's everywhere ya go, seriously). Be that as it may, a spell-check option wouldn't be a bad idea for those whose browsers do not feature one, as does Firefox. Probably be a pain to add one though.

    Live, love, laugh & be happy,
    Smikes
    Jolson did it all first,
    Crosby jazzed it up,
    Sinatra perfected it.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Am I the only one who noticed the wording in this post?

    Sorry, Mungi, but the way you phrased that, Sasquatch has a tail ('sans' means 'minus', thus if he was 'minus' a missing tail, he'd have a tail...)

    Love,

    Your friendly neighbourhood grammar police :P
    *claps*....was that really necessary? Basically it was a goof, as I know what "sans" mean, but I put "missing" in after as a mistake.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King Mungi
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Am I the only one who noticed the wording in this post?

    Sorry, Mungi, but the way you phrased that, Sasquatch has a tail ('sans' means 'minus', thus if he was 'minus' a missing tail, he'd have a tail...)

    Love,

    Your friendly neighbourhood grammar police :P
    *claps*....was that really necessary? Basically it was a goof, as I know what "sans" mean, but I put "missing" in after as a mistake.
    yeah, I know. I do apologise, Mungi. I was in a nitpicky mood when I wrote that. it wasn't meant to insult or imply anything.
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    yeah, I know. I do apologise, Mungi. I was in a nitpicky mood when I wrote that. it wasn't meant to insult or imply anything.
    No harm done then

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S. Michael Simms
    Am I the only one who noticed the wording in this post?
    No, you're just the only one who felt the need to point it out.

    I have all but given up trying to correct people's grammar, spelling, etc. on discussion boards as not only does it piss people off half the time, it kinda makes ya look a little pompous. I think if you can understand the point someone's trying to make, that's all that really counts-- it's not like we're in school or even at work where such things matter.

    If ya sweat the small stuff, yer gonna give yerself a Grammar Headache (cuz it's everywhere ya go, seriously). Be that as it may, a spell-check option wouldn't be a bad idea for those whose browsers do not feature one, as does Firefox. Probably be a pain to add one though.

    Live, love, laugh & be happy,
    Smikes

    I don't mind if someone said my mistakes in a gentle and kind way. But I'm the obsessive with perfection kind of girl. And well, I must be doing tons of mistakes in my english, but I'm loosing it right now because I don't practice enough.
    Quand l'appétit va, tout va!
    -Obélix

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •