But did Swifty ever say he was a happy Canuck?Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
But did Swifty ever say he was a happy Canuck?Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
Originally Posted by Phil
that was lame, I'm telling Todd on you...
Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker
"Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
- Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine
All Canucks are happy by nature, it's in their genetic make up. I read this book was which tells you so. In it, Dr Godfrey Doolally presented a very good ...Originally Posted by Phil
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Now... we may continue
A Mod walks amongst us, what colours can you make your hair go Phil?Originally Posted by Phil
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Brown to grey to white around you lot...
Truely you are a Mod amongst men.Originally Posted by Phil
You got my dinner money back yet?
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
If by dinner money you mean enough for a bottle of vodka and a pack of Rizla, yes.
Your a good person Phil. I knew Allan was lying when he said all those bad things about you.Originally Posted by Phil
Not telling tales or anything
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Or maybe its really "earth-coloured", and thus could be light brown or dark brown or black or sandy blonde ... or even green maybe!!!Originally Posted by Phil
I sincerely doubt we could do any of the above, whereas we have been going on different interpretations to try and figure Thors hair colour, we hae Phils word that his hair is multi coloured. I have to believe him as he got my dinner money back.Originally Posted by Powersurge
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Yes, but all we really have are the words "brown", "grey" and "white", which, depending on who reads them could potentially mean blue, gold, and/or rainbow swirl.Originally Posted by DelBubs
Yes, but the words written by Phil are in the context of todays English whereas the words describing Thors Barnet are rough translations from centuries old text which have been bastardised by whoever has translated them, or translated and interpreted the already translated and interpreted centuries old text. Or not as the case may beOriginally Posted by Powersurge
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Indeed. The word that we use to indciate brown today, ie. brown, is the descendent of the same word that we used for brown 1000 years ago, which itself is descended from a root that was used to indicate things brown.Originally Posted by DelBubs
Godforbid someone suggest that 1+1 = 2. Some genius would find someway to overcomplicate the matter, in true genius fashion.
But hey
The word may remain the same, but would all historical text writers have the same definition of brown, or would some describe Auburn of mild ginger as brown. What we need is somone who went to the Pub with Thor, or at least knew his hairdresser.Originally Posted by Powersurge
As for 1+1=2, in standard maths yes, but in a binary sequence, then we have problems.
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!