Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Great Beasts and the Gods of the Artic

  1. #1

    Default Great Beasts and the Gods of the Artic

    How high up the marvel heigharchy would you place them? high? low? medium, high-class skyfather...etc...etc

  2. #2

    Default

    Do you mean rated as individuals or as a group(the Great Beasts and the Artic Gods)?

  3. #3

    Default

    Well compared to other Marvel gods, such as the Olympians or the Norse Gods, Titans, etc. How well do they stack up against them? How well does the Great Beasts stack up against other Marvel "gods"? and same for the gods of the artic

  4. #4

    Default

    A personal thought I always had was "how would Somon fair against Loki" being as they are both tricksters. It would be cool if they had profiles of them like they do in the marvel encyclopedia of every one else, Sorry I can't help as I don't recall anyone making a comparison in the comics

  5. #5

    Default

    I'd say that the Nordic and Graeco-Roman myths have a firm hold on the top of the Marvel hierarchy. Thor has long had his own series, as well as making regular appearances in titles, while Hercules had had his own mini-series, was a regular in the Avengers, et al.

    In Thor 300, when the gods of Earth gathered to discuss the coming judgement of the Celestials, the idea that each cultural pantheon had a "Skyfather" that represented its pantheon on a great council of Skyfather gods was expressed. While Odin was portrayed as embodying the will of the council, ie. top of the hierarchy (at the time), the council appeared more of a gathering of equals.

    I would say that, all-in-all the artic deities are on par with any other group of deities, even as the great beasts are a force comparable in might to the "giants" or the titans.

    But Marvel has done well with Nordic mythos.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Powersurge
    But Marvel has done well with Nordic mythos.
    ... as long as you ignore the blatant rewritings, such as Loki as Odin's adopted son instead of his brother, Odin's apparent need of his 'Odin-Sleeps' every decade or so (according to myth, Odin can't sleep, 'else the sun wouldn't rise), the fact that Lady Sif was anything BUT virtuous, and the fact that the closest ones to the description of the Warrior's Three weren't Aesir, they were Vanir (peace-gods). Then there's the matter with Odin's eye...

    But I will agree, as much as they changed the myths, Marvel did a lot of honouring to the old Tuetonic gods.
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    ... as long as you ignore the blatant rewritings, such as Loki as Odin's adopted son instead of his brother,
    Which is itself a rewrite, along with the ranking of Loki as a god, when he is an etin, ie "giant". He is an oathbrother with Woden in the Eddaic myth


    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Odin's apparent need of his 'Odin-Sleeps' every decade or so (according to myth, Odin can't sleep, 'else the sun wouldn't rise)
    In 20 years of devoute study and worship I've never heard that the sun wouldn't rise if Woden slept; the sun being roundly associated with feminine deities and Yngvi-FreyR in the surviving myths. Of course, I've never heard of the Odin-sleep (outside of comics) either!!


    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    the fact that Lady Sif was anything BUT virtuous
    Hmmmm. I thinking .... thinking ... remembering ... not finding anything to suggest that Sif wasn't virtuous by real world standards. The biggest role Sif takes in surviving myth is to have her hair chopped off by Laufey's son. Outside of that, maybe Loki accuses her of something in the Lokesenna, but he's not called the Father of Lies because of his honesty!


    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    and the fact that the closest ones to the description of the Warrior's Three weren't Aesir, they were Vanir (peace-gods).
    Well, Freyja, called the Vanadis (Guardian Spirit of the Vanir), is remembered to have shared half of the battle-slain with Woden. As far as the male deities go, Odin-Vili-Ve, Odin-Hoenir-Logi, Odin-Thor-FreyR, and Ingui-Irmin-Iscio are the most significant gods that appear in threes. Any of them could be dubbed the "Warriors Three". Three was/is also the number of toasts yielded up at a religious feast ... a custom that continued long after the conversion, like much else Teutonic heathen.


    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Then there's the matter with Odin's eye...
    Not to mention his build ... Woden has always been described as very tall, and very slender. Then there are the clothes that they all wear. Then there is the depiction of Asgard as a city as opposed to a rural setting, the depiction of Tyr as something less then the God of Glory and father of the gods that he originally was considered. The list of what Marvel got "wrong" in regards to the Teutonic gods is enormous, but what does one expect from a comic?

    As far as change in the myths, those myths have been ondergoing subtle alterations and modifications, in keeping with the historical experience of the Teutonic people --- who gave us the Rule of Precedent --- since the Indo-Europeans first settled in southern Scandinavia at the end of the Stone Age. The German pantheon presented by the Roman Historian Cornelius Tacitus, while roundly clealry the same, placed Tiw at the head of the pantheon, has Heimdal as his son, and makes both Woden and Frey brothers and sons of Heimdall.

    Chances are, if we had more complete data from nuerous different time periods (Stone Age to Bronze Age, Bronze Age to Celtic Iron Age, Germanic Iron Age/Migration Age to end of the Viking Age) and the numerous different tribes, we would see (MORE of how) certain core elments persist, despite time and space, but also different arrangements within the pantheon that reflect the peculiar experience and identity of each particular tribe.

    The bigggest change we can speak of came with the beginning of the Celtic Iron Age, when the climate began to cool, causing land resources to shrink in southern Scandinavia, and sending them out of their homeland and into the Celtic held lands that we today would call Germany. This is when the cult of Woden began to take on greater meaning and assert itself in the religion. Its throughout this period that Wodens name *begins* appearing in the geneologies of various NW European royals.


    But I will agree, as much as they changed the myths, Marvel did a lot of honouring to the old Tuetonic gods.[/quote]

  8. #8

    Default

    Talk about changes between myth and Marvel version, and no one questions why Thor is blonde?
    www.kozzi.us

    recent publications in M-Brane Science Fiction and the anthology Things We Are Not.
    Forthcoming stories in Breath and Shadow, Star Dreck anthology and The Aether Age: Helios.

    ~I woke up one morning finally seeing the world through a rose colored lense. It turned out to be a blood hemorrhage in my good eye.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kozzi24
    Talk about changes between myth and Marvel version, and no one questions why Thor is blonde?
    Actually, from the versions of the myth I've read about, primarily, Baldur and Thor envision the epitome of Tuetonic (later "Aryan") ideal: blond, blue-eyed (there are myths where he's depicted as red-haired, but most of the ones I've seen, including a translation of The Harbaroslijoo, he is blond). They were said to be opposite ends of the scale of perfection (Thor was a warrior, whereas Baldur was a peace-god), yet they were not only allies and brothers, they were also linked to each other, that the death of Baldur would spurn Ragnorok, and Thor would lead the battle.

    One REAL question I wanna know is why Marvel kept depicting Thor (and not one of his replacements) as clean shaven. In early Scandinavian culture, beards were signs of manhood. Having the epitome of manhood being cleanshaven is a bit of an oxymoron...
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  10. #10

    Default

    Or why Marvel cast "Red Thor" as a villian at one point, and made an entirely differnt entity than goldilocks.

    Apparently, my ancestors did things in Thor's name that blondie didn't agree with. Such as? Would it be demonzing an entire race of people becasue one of them supposedly betrayed one's man-god? Perhaps it was waging war on an entire race of people, firmly convinced that they are the epitome of evil, and all over an eternally war torn and anything but "holy" piece of land? And then turning around and comdeming to Hell te warriors that went and fought for you? Or perhpas it was the merciliess torture and slaughter of millions of Jews, women, scientists, and even even other folks of the same religion because of some subtle difference of opinion on some fine point of doctrine?

    Hmmmm. The backs of captial criminals were broken in the name of Thor by the Viking Age Scandinavians. Other than that Thor oversaw oaths, upheld the sanctity of the community, fostered the cultivation of physical and spiritual strength, ie. might and main, and ensured the fertility of land and womb. Thats SOME evil. Bad Red Thor. Baaaaad.

    Sorry for the little rant.

  11. #11

    Default

    Don't remember 'Red Thor' in Marvel (only the various costumes that Thor had, as well as the temporary replacement with Eric Masterson, and all known varieties were blond)
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Actually, from the versions of the myth I've read about, primarily, Baldur and Thor envision the epitome of Tuetonic (later "Aryan") ideal: blond, blue-eyed (there are myths where he's depicted as red-haired, but most of the ones I've seen, including a translation of The Harbaroslijoo, he is blond).
    That wouyld be the "Harbarzljodh" or Lay/Ljod of Harbard. And in fact, all of the elder myths, when they bother to describe the appearance of a god at all (not an easy task incidently!!!) Thor is described as having red hair, in keeping with his sky and weather associations and his guardianship of man, ie. red sky in morning ... red sky at night ...

    Not that I'm going to debate the colour of a disembodied spirits hair, hehehehe, but thats the fact.

    Regarding the term Aryan, it is actaully highly inappropriate to apply to the Teutonic (Germanic, Gothic, Nordic, all equally catch-alls) peoples. In fact, the term Aryan appears to have a been a tribal name peculiar to the East Indo-Europeans. It is the word that the Hindu noble caste uses to described itself, and is also found in the name of the nation-state Iran. The lny place we find this term in the West is with the Celts, who didn't arrive in NW Europe til around 1800 BCE and came out of the SE following a warming trend. A cooling trend had sent the Aryan I-E tribes on a south easterly migration earlier on. The Celtic language/s bear all of the characteristics of an eastern Indo-European language. The Teutonic folk on the otherhand had been in southern Scandinavia since the late Stone Age, c2,300 BCE onward off the top of my head, following another warming, and our languages are usually grouped with the Baltic and Slavic tongues. All fiormly Western I-E with no natural occurence of the term Aryan.

    The word Deutshce on the other hand is far older. Its related to the term Teuton, the Old English theod and the Norse thjod, all of which mean "the tribe, the people, the folk". The term theoden, which some might recognize from Tolkein, means "Master of the Tribe" or "King". Ingaevone probably trumps Deutsche though, as evidence of its application as a catchall for the tribes of southern Scandinavia comes as early as the 1st century BCE. It is also based on the name of the god Ingui-Frea, or Yngvi-Frey as the Swedes called him.



    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    They were said to be opposite ends of the scale of perfection (Thor was a warrior, whereas Baldur was a peace-god), yet they were not only allies and brothers, they were also linked to each other, that the death of Baldur would spurn Ragnorok, and Thor would lead the battle.
    Well, the name Baldur means "warrior" and in Saxo Grammaticus' depiction of him (Gesta Danorum) he is portrayerd, one, as a mortal, and two as a warrior-king ... all of whom were considered descended from Odin, ie. Odin's sons, by the time end of the Migration Age. Even in Snorri's Eddas, Balder's role, other than as a literary device to signal the onset of man's period of cultural and spiritual amnesia, is a big fat unknown. He has no known cult sites. He received no worship. He was rewritten to be a Jesuslike figure, etc., etc.

    Anyway, it is also Odin who leads the battle at Ragnarok. Even within the context of the Eddas -- and I'm more like a Teutonic rabbi, than a Teutonic bishop, so I read more than just the Eddas, and thus don't place too much on the Eddas --- but even in that context Thor's role in Ragny-shmagny-rok is unclear. The Harbazljodh indicates that he might have killed the Wolrd Serpent, who, thus, cannot engage Redbeard let alone kill him, at Ragnarok. Not that a disembodied spirit could die. Or that a mere mortal could possibly percceive the event, but men can and will feel free to flatter themselves.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    Don't remember 'Red Thor' in Marvel (only the various costumes that Thor had, as well as the temporary replacement with Eric Masterson, and all known varieties were blond)
    Well, its a fact, so search and you shall find. Don't bother searching through anything within the past 15 years though. You gotta go further back.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Powersurge
    That wouyld be the "Harbarzljodh"
    that's how it's spelled on my copy. Don't ask me, I didn't print the book.

    And in fact, all of the elder myths, when they bother to describe the appearance of a god at all (not an easy task incidently!!!) Thor is described as having red hair...
    If you read what I said, I said in most of the versions I've read - I never said in all of them, and as such, you obviously can't claim the same fact, since, obviously, not all of them say that. Believe me, I am well versed in my mythology, but can only quote or paraphrase from the sourses given to me. I do not claim to have ALL the sourses.

    Regarding the term Aryan...
    Again, you need to start reading WHOLE sentences, since I said 'later', as in, it was adopted in the Aryan principle oft-quoted by the Third Reich, among others, pre- and post-war. I am well aware that what we refer to as 'Aryan' today has little or no bearing on the original meaning and usage (even though you did teach me a couple new things, so tahnk you for the history lesson).

    Well, the name Baldur...
    and

    Anyway, it is also Odin who leads the battle at Ragnarok..
    See above about not having all sourse of mythology. As I said, I can only go by what I've read and studied, and though most of what you said is said in some version, in others it isn't said. Same I find can be said for you, since you have obviously not read the same passages I have (if I can find the books I found them in, I'll give you a book list so you can cross-compare).

    I am not Teutonic clergy, but I've been studying comparative theology and mythology for 12 years, with heavy accent on Judeo-Christo-Islam, Greco-Roman, Egyptian, Meso-American and Teutonic mythology and symbology (I'm more secular-clergy), so please believe me when I say I'm no slouch in this department, either.

    (note to self, FINISH a sentese before hitting 'submit'!)
    Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker

    "Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
    - Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyCanuck
    If you read what I said, I said in most of the versions I've read - I never said in all of them, and as such, you obviously can't claim the same fact, since, obviously, not all of them say that. Believe me, I am well versed in my mythology, but can only quote or paraphrase from the sourses given to me. I do not claim to have ALL the sourses.
    Well, exaclty how many sources on Norse myth do you think there are Happy?!?! There is the Poetic Edda, Snorri' Sturluson's Prose Edda and Heimskringla, Saxo Grammaticus' Gesta Danorum, and a scattering of scant references spread throughout the Icelandic sagas. These are our ONLY sources for Viking Age myth and NONE of them say Thor has blonde hair. They all say, and comparative Indo-European mythology reinforces it, that the Thunderer's hair is RED. And as someone who has been specifically studying Teutonic myth, language, history and culture for about 15 years -- not including the 6 years prior that I simply enjoyed it --I can claim, in all humble honesty, to have read ALL of the primary sources on the subject. ALL of them.

    So, I have no idea what you mean by "version" (translation? retelling by contemporay author?), or why you think that many, many, many "versions" exist. The available data, on myth, not the values and practices of the religion, is scant ... almost nonexistent, so its just not all that terribly difficult to find and absorb it all.

    Sorry.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •