And now I've just found out from someone ELSE about Astonishing... and that it's supposed to be Rachel. Eeee. Thank God, though. I loathe Kitty and her better-than-thou expository speeches.
And now I've just found out from someone ELSE about Astonishing... and that it's supposed to be Rachel. Eeee. Thank God, though. I loathe Kitty and her better-than-thou expository speeches.
Well, I'm suitably confused... maybe it's not Kitty or Rachel... maybe it's actually Dazzler... or even Professor X with a wig and a sex change...
That was my first thought but then I remembered he can't walk anymore because he wasn't reakky fixed mags was making the nano sentilels hold him up rightOriginally Posted by beetleblack
or even Professor X with a wig and a sex change...
I'm still not 100% that it's Rachel as she's supposed to be in Excalibur, it could well be Magma as Claremont's using her.
Magma's a blonde, though.
Hairdye? Everyone likes a change once in a while...
Allan 'HappyCanuck' Crocker
"Hey... Philosophers love wisdom, not mankind."
- Stephen Pastis, Pearls Before Swine
It's Rachel... I'm certain of it now...
It is not Magma!It looks nothing like Magma!& If it is Rachel, I thought she was smart enough not to wear such an ugly oufit!
http://www.anotherpilotdown.net/xmenscan/scan0003.jpg
Read the dialogue, look at Magma as the dialogue corresponds to.
well, you can't see shortstop in that picBut you can in this one:
http://www.anotherpilotdown.net/xmenscan/scan0002.jpg
It's ok though Phil, I don't know the kricket positions
Dani looks so pretty-ful!
I meant I really don't want it to be Magma.....and Puck is spelt with a capital thank you very much,http://www.anotherpilotdown.net/xmenscan/scan0003.jpg
Read the dialogue, look at Magma as the dialogue corresponds to.
There seems to be a distinct lack of smilies in some of these posts and feelings seem to be a little out of kilter in regards to the normal cordial atmosphere we have gotten use too. Maybe who's who in a book of sequential art isn't the subject to get emotive about, then again what do I know
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
I just wish we knew where Northstar was heading (possibly comic limbo????) and until we know for sure I'll be sulking in that corner over there *points* with a copy of 'Attitude' featuring our favourite speedster in the buff, expect for a strategically placed maple leaf - erm, make it a LARGE maple leaf!!! (Sorry, that edition only exhists in my head *ahem*).
This last christmas, we put a very small present in a very big box, just to decieve the recipient, but luckily they enjoyed the presie. Beetleback, I would hate for you to pull back that large Maple Leaf, to find that someone is false advertising, but after all it is your imagination, so the contents are what you make them
Del
Driftwood: Well, I got about a foot and a half. Now, it says, uh, "The party of the second part shall be known in this contract as the party of the second part."
Fiorello: Well, I don't know about that...
Driftwood: Now what's the matter?
Fiorello: I no like-a the second party, either.
Driftwood: Well, you should've come to the first party. We didn't get home 'til around four in the morning... I was blind for three days!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
