Search:

I feel like this has taken a somewhat personal/defensive turn, so I'll just walk away from it for now.

Comics are right, comics are wrong, comics contradict, comics retcon. As you say; that's...

I'm not trying to debate it.

I agree that it's correct in that it's physically in-print.

However it's wrong in that it has to be one or the other, like Bochs & Jeffries first meeting.

I'm not debating with you that the handbooks state 1914 and the published UXF panel says 100 years old (although the UXF panel above can be chalked up to exaggeration - hell, I feel like I'm 100...

Then the born in 1914 part is wrong, unless he's the only character in the entire MU who ages properly and not on the sliding scale.

Changing the subject completely I wonder if the cabin's supposed to be the same one in UXM #139-140...?

Exactly FP.
Franklin Richards was born in 1968 and is generally regarded as 8 years old now.
So Puck's definitely not 100, but he's closer to it than he is to Liz's age.

On the otherhand he has...

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

S
P
O
I
L
Z


Yup, #5.2 which prompted my point about age.

S

P

O

I

L

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Not sure where that was ever stated....

It is a shame that McGuinness leaves the title with this issue.

Hopefully Barberi can live up to him.

That was my thought on Mac.

S

P

O

I

L

S

P

O

I

L

I officially hate the time difference.

I REALLY want to talk about this with you guys!!!!

Please remember to leave

S

P

O

I