Search:

Not at all stupid.
THe problem with a lot of characters and titles is that their (yes, I realize that I am talking about comics here) lifespanis completely unrealistic.
If we are to believe that...

ah geez...
i just spent the past few days re-reading the first 60 issues of volume one and re-reading voume 2 in it's entirety.
What would i consider as a line up?

Sasquatch, for sure.
Aurora...

That's pretty much what the Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe: X-Men 2004 says about it in Beast's entry.


:D What's the difference?

Did they work on any other men?



Exactly. I can understand the point that now that it seems to be becoming more and more mainstream to accept homosexuality, and thus more acceptable to portray...

Ah, see - I didn't know that. I would have thought that that had happened before it was concretely determined that Northstar was, in fact, gay. I know that it had sort of been hinted at close to...

Nope, none of the above. Let's just say that maybe gay villains wouldn't be affected by the Purple Girls powers. There's your other way around it.
No need to jump to such negative conclusions...I...

With the amount of heavy metals showing up in everyone's bloodstream up there, it's only a matter of time.
:? :wink:

The solution is easy:
gay villains.

Having a name and concept in common with those two doesn't exactly make it better for me.
I always thought Captain America was just too much...and Union Jack, well, that's a lot like Captain...

Personally, I can't even stand the concept of "Major Mapleleaf."
That's just exceptionally lame.
Why not just throw in a Sargeant Syrop?
Guardian/Vindicator were great....non-powered people...

What?!
No one would enlist the Purple Girl?